Katherine: Meretta comes out of an asylum, having flashbacks and seeing things. Slips into a coma, gets dragged into hell. Sam tries to rescue her, but she gets dragged off into an eviler place. She dies.
Jason: Apocalyptic world, destroyed by a virus, very few humans remain. Robin hears a radio signal about a safe haven, goes on a journey to find the safe haven, along the way he finds many people but not all of these can be trusted.
Tyler: A secret pact between Dante, a vampire and the village he has a grasp on. A child and son move to the village after the death of the child’s mother, to start a new life. The villagers capture the son as an offering for the vampire, a tradition held over a number of years. The father’s journey begins in order to rescue him.
Jacob: Katherine is a goth who collects Victorian items with her and best friends Tyler, Jason and Jacob. Being adventurous, they go and look around the abandoned hospital outside of town. Katherine discovers a lovecraftian pendant within the rubble and adds it to her collection of gothic and Victorian items. She then realises she’s being stalked and as her friends are murdered, dissected and turned into Frankenstein-like mounds of flesh, she realises that the pendant is related to an ancient curse of a plague doctor.
Conclusion and selection: After discussion, the group decided to use Jacob’s idea, it already had fitting parts for the people available and suitable local locations which we could alter to our needs. Props and other required things were already in possession by various members of the group, to make the end task of creating the trailer much easier.
Thursday, 15 November 2012
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
Original Film Idea - Individual
The government have developed a virus that has the potential to wipe out all
mankind, a chemical weapon that was meant for defensive purposes. However
this information was leaked and countries all over the world have begun
developing this deadly virus that is invisible to the immune system, causes
their skin to turn white and takes control of the brain causing them to kill
anybody without the infection. Luckily
it also causes mild brain damage and in result the contaminated humans are only
smart enough to use melee weapons.
As an act of terrorism, these chemical weapons were launched to a number of countries all over the world. Countries returned fire and most of the world became contaminated with this virus. Now humanity is on the brink of extinction. However we find out that there are some people who are immune to the virus that have o- blood.
For the story we follow the struggles of Robin Hotz as he hears a radio transition saying about a survivor’s safe haven at a military nuclear bunker with enough supplies to last until the contaminated humans are wiped out and it is safe. Robin gathers up supplies and leaves his house to get to the safe haven and rebuild humanity. It is a long journey to reach the safe haven and Robin will meet a number of other survivors along the way. However who can be trusted when it’s the end of the world and anything goes?
As an act of terrorism, these chemical weapons were launched to a number of countries all over the world. Countries returned fire and most of the world became contaminated with this virus. Now humanity is on the brink of extinction. However we find out that there are some people who are immune to the virus that have o- blood.
For the story we follow the struggles of Robin Hotz as he hears a radio transition saying about a survivor’s safe haven at a military nuclear bunker with enough supplies to last until the contaminated humans are wiped out and it is safe. Robin gathers up supplies and leaves his house to get to the safe haven and rebuild humanity. It is a long journey to reach the safe haven and Robin will meet a number of other survivors along the way. However who can be trusted when it’s the end of the world and anything goes?
Sunday, 11 November 2012
Final film trailer analysis
I will start with setting. At the start of the trailer we see David and his wife happy with their child Billy outside of their medium size peaceful looking house. We also see when the car is driving past that the setting must generally be a village or small town due to the luscious number of trees and grassy areas. The trailer then cuts to the supermarket where the majority of the trailer takes place. This setting then changes from a casual supermarket to a isolated safe haven from the creatures of the mist. The mist consumes the supermarket and we assume that Brent's attempt to go outside got him killed. For the rest of the trailer we only see action take place in the supermarket and rightfully so as it is where the majority of the film takes place.
Next up is technical codes. These technical codes are camera, mise en scène, sound and editing. I will note an example in the trailer for each of these and explain how it relates to the horror genre. At 1:34 in the trailer we get an over the shoulder shot of the man taping up the windows. From the angle we get the full impact when the bug flies right onto the window in front of him. It makes for a jump moment which is common within the horror genre. From 1:34 onwards we also see that night time comes and it is also dark within the store with no electricity, this is also where the action and conflict starts to escalate being conventional to the horror film tradition of the night time being less safe. Throughout the trailer music is playing, this quiets down a certain points to hear the characters however it is still there and changes throughout the trailer. At the start of the trailer, the music is nice, high tone and cheery. A siren then leads to some suspense music at 0:34 which quietens down and stops for a bit so we concentrate on the particular scene. At 1:25 a different piece of music comes back that continues with a tension building atmosphere and then unleashes when the monsters start attacking and everything becomes out of control. Finally for editing. Similar to how the sound is throughout the trailer we see at the start that there are lots of long shots which give us an indication that it is peaceful and fine. As the tension starts to build up the shots get smaller and cut to the next shots more rapidly. This keeps the audience attention on the trailer and near the end where the tension is high they are very rapid cuts and screen flashes. These have been added during the editing process and add to the impact of the trailer.
The iconography for the trailer is a small peaceful town that is consumed by to which we assume is a supernatural force. For the rest of the trailer we see that everyone is trapped in the store. The iconography of a store in a small town turns into everyone's only safe-haven. The mist houses the unknown and is dangerous to go out in to.
In The Mist, the narrative is explained pretty well in the trailer without spoiling the end for obvious reasons. The trailer goes through the narrative of the movie without allowing the audience to piece too much of the story together. We know the movie starts all nice and happy, the mist comes over and disrupts the equilibrium. To not spoil the movie we do not see the resolution and if the equilibrium is restored or not.
The main character we can assume is David Drayton due to him getting the most screen time compared to any other character throughout the trailer. At the start of the trailer we following him to the supermarket, the trailer clearly wants us to pay attention to him. We also see that the religious lady Mrs. Carmody causes much of the conflict in the trailer where she gets slapped and tries to take David's son as a sacrifice. Being in charge of two of the major scenes in the trailer we can assume that she is an important character.
There are many themes that we can see throughout the trailer, some being more obvious then others. There is the more obvious themes like danger, supernatural forces and fear. There is also some more obscure ones that the trailer doesn't obviously show like religion, willpower and sacrifice. There are more then these 6 themes but they are obvious to find.
Monday, 5 November 2012
'The Crazies (2010)' in relation to the 4 narrative theories
I have already explained the four narrative theories when relating them to 'Halloween' so I will only be relating these theories to The Crazies and giving a conclusion on how these theories relate to it.
Tzvetan Todorov
The story in The Crazies follows this theory better than in Halloween as we find out during the film more about how this equilibrium was disrupted. However it still isn't set out in the traditional Hollywood style narrative. We see at the start that there is an equilibrium and the equilibrium is disrupted. This escalates until eventually the army is there, testing everyone and then going to blow the town up. We get a clue rather close to the start that the plane in the river is somehow poisoning the water however we are not confirmed on this until near the end where the Intelligence Officer tells them that it was a biological weapon. Being typical of the horror genre the movie also ends without a happy ending where the satellite that scans them as contaminated with the virus as thy enter into the new city restoring and not restoring the equilibrium at the same time. They survive but they're going to become crazy and possibly contaminate another town/city.
Vladimir Propp
I will relate the characters from The Crazies as best as I can to the 8 character roles that Propp summarizes based off his the folk tales he has heard. The hero in The Crazies would arguably be David and his wife Judy, they are both the survivors at the end and are strong willed saving each other throughout the film. The villain would be the government and the crazies. We see in the barn scene that the army is just following orders and is trying to prevent and more people from being harmed. However the government are the ones that caused the people to turn into the crazies basically killing them. The crazies themselves are villains due to the fact that they will murder anyone that isn't crazy on sight, they have lost all reasoning and will kill. The donor would be David as the gun is what gives him the edge over the crazies. The helper is Deputy Russell who saves Davids life on a number of occasions and sacrifices himself when he knows he's gone to save David and Judy, the heroes. The princess is Judy as she is the lady that David is determined to save, he goes out of his way risking himself to save her. The princesses father is David as he gives himself the reward of going back to a normal life with his wife to live in peace. The dispatcher again is David, with the whole town becoming crazy he decides himself to go on the quest to escape the town. There is not really any false hero throughout the story and even though Russell has a moment where he almost kills the heroes, he realities he's not healthy and sacrifices himself before becoming a false hero.
Claude Levi-Strauss
I will note a few binary oppositions and note them. Being a horror film many of these generally relate to horror movies or sub-genres of horror movies.
Bordwell and Thompson
During the movie of The Crazies we see the plot, however there is also a story behind this plot that we figure out for ourselves as the story progresses on. We piece this puzzle together as we go through the movie and think outside the plot to other things like character lives. When we see Peggy Hamill telling David about how Rory was a drunk we then picture Rory's life and connect to it more and learn more about the characters. That scene then leads on the David thinking on the moment when he shot Rory and think on to about David as a character and his morals, we see that a bit of guilt was inside of him because maybe Rory wasn't going to shoot. Did David have a past memory where a similar situation occurred? We will never know because that is not in the plot. Within the plot we also get an idea of some of the story, we find out that the plane was carrying a biological weapon and then we can look at the events that led up to that event in space and time.
Conclusion
In conclusion The Crazies has a similar narrative to horror films in general and relates to the narrative theories to a limited extent. However due to the sub-genre of the horror film, there are some differances present for example some of the binary opposites.
Tzvetan Todorov
The story in The Crazies follows this theory better than in Halloween as we find out during the film more about how this equilibrium was disrupted. However it still isn't set out in the traditional Hollywood style narrative. We see at the start that there is an equilibrium and the equilibrium is disrupted. This escalates until eventually the army is there, testing everyone and then going to blow the town up. We get a clue rather close to the start that the plane in the river is somehow poisoning the water however we are not confirmed on this until near the end where the Intelligence Officer tells them that it was a biological weapon. Being typical of the horror genre the movie also ends without a happy ending where the satellite that scans them as contaminated with the virus as thy enter into the new city restoring and not restoring the equilibrium at the same time. They survive but they're going to become crazy and possibly contaminate another town/city.
Vladimir Propp
I will relate the characters from The Crazies as best as I can to the 8 character roles that Propp summarizes based off his the folk tales he has heard. The hero in The Crazies would arguably be David and his wife Judy, they are both the survivors at the end and are strong willed saving each other throughout the film. The villain would be the government and the crazies. We see in the barn scene that the army is just following orders and is trying to prevent and more people from being harmed. However the government are the ones that caused the people to turn into the crazies basically killing them. The crazies themselves are villains due to the fact that they will murder anyone that isn't crazy on sight, they have lost all reasoning and will kill. The donor would be David as the gun is what gives him the edge over the crazies. The helper is Deputy Russell who saves Davids life on a number of occasions and sacrifices himself when he knows he's gone to save David and Judy, the heroes. The princess is Judy as she is the lady that David is determined to save, he goes out of his way risking himself to save her. The princesses father is David as he gives himself the reward of going back to a normal life with his wife to live in peace. The dispatcher again is David, with the whole town becoming crazy he decides himself to go on the quest to escape the town. There is not really any false hero throughout the story and even though Russell has a moment where he almost kills the heroes, he realities he's not healthy and sacrifices himself before becoming a false hero.
Claude Levi-Strauss
I will note a few binary oppositions and note them. Being a horror film many of these generally relate to horror movies or sub-genres of horror movies.
- Sanity vs Insanity
- Good vs Evil
- Night vs Day
- Healthy vs Unhealthy
- Safety vs Danger
- Love vs Hate
Bordwell and Thompson
During the movie of The Crazies we see the plot, however there is also a story behind this plot that we figure out for ourselves as the story progresses on. We piece this puzzle together as we go through the movie and think outside the plot to other things like character lives. When we see Peggy Hamill telling David about how Rory was a drunk we then picture Rory's life and connect to it more and learn more about the characters. That scene then leads on the David thinking on the moment when he shot Rory and think on to about David as a character and his morals, we see that a bit of guilt was inside of him because maybe Rory wasn't going to shoot. Did David have a past memory where a similar situation occurred? We will never know because that is not in the plot. Within the plot we also get an idea of some of the story, we find out that the plane was carrying a biological weapon and then we can look at the events that led up to that event in space and time.
Conclusion
In conclusion The Crazies has a similar narrative to horror films in general and relates to the narrative theories to a limited extent. However due to the sub-genre of the horror film, there are some differances present for example some of the binary opposites.
Thursday, 18 October 2012
Analysis of a horror trailer
I am going to be analysing a trailer for the horror movie 'Possession'. This trailer is recent and the movie was only released less then 2 months ago.
I have not watched the movie my self however the trailer does make it clear what the movie is going to be about without spoiling the plot.
This movie is not exactly distinct in any way as the idea of possession has been done many times before. One of the most well known examples of this is 'The Exorcist'. Also as is very common for possession movies, is that a little girl is the target as it invokes more emotion with the little girl being the most innocent. The trailer show with superimposed text that the movie is based off a true story however it is doubtful that these events occurred in the real world on such a large scale but those more religious or weak willed will be more afraid because of this.
The horror trailer seems to follow the general codes and conventions for a horror movie, particularly to the possession style sub-genre. There is a supernatural force that slowly takes over it's host and becomes more apparent the longer they are possessed. A religious figure or man who researches deity's will identify the demon who has possessed the target. Eventually the demon starts to become uncontrollable and as is with a trailer it ends so that you'll have to watch to movie to see the conclusion.
It is hard to relate narrative theory to a trailer as it is not the whole package however some analysing can be done. Todorov's theory can be applied to this trailer to a limited extent. At the start of the trailer which we assume is also the start of the movie, the father and his daughter are fooling around, having a fun time. The equilibrium is then disrupted when we hear that the box was not intended to be opened and the little girl opens it. We can also see this when the girl says herself that she feels funny. We do not know whether this equilibrium is restored or not and would need to watch the movie to find out, it is not certain as is normally the case with horror movies.
Propp's theory can also be related to this to identify certain character roles. The villain and the dispatcher is probably the demon. The demon is the one controlling the girl and is the reason the father is trying to help her. This leads to the hero and princesses father, the father of the possessed girl who must identify the villain and stop it from killing the princess, the little girl. The man in the university and the Jewish people seems to be the helpers providing knowledge on the situation to help the hero defeat the villain by knowing more about him. There doesn't seems to be a false hero at least from what the trailer shows and the donor may be the Jewish people who may have gave the man the book to perform an exorcism or it could also be the hospital to look at the girls medical condition.
Levi-Strauss' theory is about binary oppositions and some of these are presented in the trailer, particularly those in conventional horror films. A few examples would be.
I have not watched the movie my self however the trailer does make it clear what the movie is going to be about without spoiling the plot.
This movie is not exactly distinct in any way as the idea of possession has been done many times before. One of the most well known examples of this is 'The Exorcist'. Also as is very common for possession movies, is that a little girl is the target as it invokes more emotion with the little girl being the most innocent. The trailer show with superimposed text that the movie is based off a true story however it is doubtful that these events occurred in the real world on such a large scale but those more religious or weak willed will be more afraid because of this.
The horror trailer seems to follow the general codes and conventions for a horror movie, particularly to the possession style sub-genre. There is a supernatural force that slowly takes over it's host and becomes more apparent the longer they are possessed. A religious figure or man who researches deity's will identify the demon who has possessed the target. Eventually the demon starts to become uncontrollable and as is with a trailer it ends so that you'll have to watch to movie to see the conclusion.
It is hard to relate narrative theory to a trailer as it is not the whole package however some analysing can be done. Todorov's theory can be applied to this trailer to a limited extent. At the start of the trailer which we assume is also the start of the movie, the father and his daughter are fooling around, having a fun time. The equilibrium is then disrupted when we hear that the box was not intended to be opened and the little girl opens it. We can also see this when the girl says herself that she feels funny. We do not know whether this equilibrium is restored or not and would need to watch the movie to find out, it is not certain as is normally the case with horror movies.
Propp's theory can also be related to this to identify certain character roles. The villain and the dispatcher is probably the demon. The demon is the one controlling the girl and is the reason the father is trying to help her. This leads to the hero and princesses father, the father of the possessed girl who must identify the villain and stop it from killing the princess, the little girl. The man in the university and the Jewish people seems to be the helpers providing knowledge on the situation to help the hero defeat the villain by knowing more about him. There doesn't seems to be a false hero at least from what the trailer shows and the donor may be the Jewish people who may have gave the man the book to perform an exorcism or it could also be the hospital to look at the girls medical condition.
Levi-Strauss' theory is about binary oppositions and some of these are presented in the trailer, particularly those in conventional horror films. A few examples would be.
- Religious vs Anti religious
- Natural vs Supernatural
- Good vs Evil
- Science vs Magic
- Control vs No control
Sunday, 14 October 2012
'Halloween' in relation to the 4 narrative theories
Tzvetan Todorov
Todorov's theory explain how a story will begin with a state of equilibrium between two opposing forces. This equilibrium is then disrupted by some event that then sparks a series of events to restore the problems and restore order to the world of fiction. This theory is the base of the classic Hollywood structure.
In relation to Halloween it doesn't explain the narrative structure of the story too well as it does not really explain how this equilibrium has been disrupted. It mainly just says how the story has a beginning where everyone is alive and happy. The equilibrium being disrupted by the bogey man escaping sparking a chain of events eventually resulting in the ending where the equilibrium wasn't fully restored as the bogey man was still alive.
Vladimir Propp
Propp's theory was based off the 100's of folk tales he read resulting in him identifying 8 character roles and 31 narrative functions. The 8 character roles he identified were the villain, the hero, the donor, the helper, the princess, the princesses father, the dispatcher and the false hero.
Being based of folk tales, it is hard to define these roles to Halloween or any more obscure genre like horror. This is genrally because horror doesn't like to stick to the general codes and conventions that a more conventional genre like action does. Obviously the hero is the girl that lives at the end and the villan is the bogey man. The doctor is a helper as he is trying to find and stop the villan throughout the movie, the also saves the girl at the end. Even with this information though it still only tells us that there are these roles that the characters play. It is not in depth still.
Claude Levi-Strauss
Levi-Strauss looks a bit more deep into the narrative structure by looking at a narrative in terms of binary oppositions. Instead of 1's and 0's we look at oppsites such as good and evil or light and dark. These binary oppositions can genrally be associated to particular genres or multiple where good and evil can be applied to many genres but more obscure ones like natural and supernatural genrally stick to sci-fi and horror.
This theory better explains the story of haloween and can easily be tied to its horror genre through the binary oppositions that occur. A couple of examples for this would be natural vs supernatural as we see at the end, the boogie man was not human. Light vs dark because we only saw the murders happen at night where evil is genrally at it's strongest. Looking at all these binary oppositions we can easily piece together a good idea of what the story is about.
Bordwell and Thompson
This technically isn't a narrative theory but does put together some interesting ideas. In their book "Film Art: An Introduction" they defined narrative as "a chain of events in a cause-effect relationship, occuring in time and space". In a way, this is similar to Todorov's theory but on a much more open and deeper level. The theory defines where the event took place, when the event took place and what span of time the event took place over. It explains how narrative will manipulate our awareness of time and place though techniques such as flashbacks or jumps between place and time.
This theory also can explain the narrative of halloween on a much deeper level and breaks down the plot of the story. Right from the start of the story when we see the vision of the boy walking up the stairs, we see he is holding a knife, we immediatly know he is going to murder the occupents of the house and come to a shock when the mask is taken off and we see the kind standing there with the knife. We know that something is wrong. The movie then makes it clear that time has passed and that the man who escaped the asylum was the same boy who murdered his family.
Conclusion
Halloween being a horror movie means that a deeper analysis is required when looking into the narrative for the story. This is why explaining the story's equilabrium or assigning character roles is not enough to analyse a more obscure genre like horror. A deeper look is required which is why the last 2 theories are better suited to explain halloween.
Todorov's theory explain how a story will begin with a state of equilibrium between two opposing forces. This equilibrium is then disrupted by some event that then sparks a series of events to restore the problems and restore order to the world of fiction. This theory is the base of the classic Hollywood structure.
In relation to Halloween it doesn't explain the narrative structure of the story too well as it does not really explain how this equilibrium has been disrupted. It mainly just says how the story has a beginning where everyone is alive and happy. The equilibrium being disrupted by the bogey man escaping sparking a chain of events eventually resulting in the ending where the equilibrium wasn't fully restored as the bogey man was still alive.
Vladimir Propp
Propp's theory was based off the 100's of folk tales he read resulting in him identifying 8 character roles and 31 narrative functions. The 8 character roles he identified were the villain, the hero, the donor, the helper, the princess, the princesses father, the dispatcher and the false hero.
Being based of folk tales, it is hard to define these roles to Halloween or any more obscure genre like horror. This is genrally because horror doesn't like to stick to the general codes and conventions that a more conventional genre like action does. Obviously the hero is the girl that lives at the end and the villan is the bogey man. The doctor is a helper as he is trying to find and stop the villan throughout the movie, the also saves the girl at the end. Even with this information though it still only tells us that there are these roles that the characters play. It is not in depth still.
Claude Levi-Strauss
Levi-Strauss looks a bit more deep into the narrative structure by looking at a narrative in terms of binary oppositions. Instead of 1's and 0's we look at oppsites such as good and evil or light and dark. These binary oppositions can genrally be associated to particular genres or multiple where good and evil can be applied to many genres but more obscure ones like natural and supernatural genrally stick to sci-fi and horror.
This theory better explains the story of haloween and can easily be tied to its horror genre through the binary oppositions that occur. A couple of examples for this would be natural vs supernatural as we see at the end, the boogie man was not human. Light vs dark because we only saw the murders happen at night where evil is genrally at it's strongest. Looking at all these binary oppositions we can easily piece together a good idea of what the story is about.
Bordwell and Thompson
This technically isn't a narrative theory but does put together some interesting ideas. In their book "Film Art: An Introduction" they defined narrative as "a chain of events in a cause-effect relationship, occuring in time and space". In a way, this is similar to Todorov's theory but on a much more open and deeper level. The theory defines where the event took place, when the event took place and what span of time the event took place over. It explains how narrative will manipulate our awareness of time and place though techniques such as flashbacks or jumps between place and time.
This theory also can explain the narrative of halloween on a much deeper level and breaks down the plot of the story. Right from the start of the story when we see the vision of the boy walking up the stairs, we see he is holding a knife, we immediatly know he is going to murder the occupents of the house and come to a shock when the mask is taken off and we see the kind standing there with the knife. We know that something is wrong. The movie then makes it clear that time has passed and that the man who escaped the asylum was the same boy who murdered his family.
Conclusion
Halloween being a horror movie means that a deeper analysis is required when looking into the narrative for the story. This is why explaining the story's equilabrium or assigning character roles is not enough to analyse a more obscure genre like horror. A deeper look is required which is why the last 2 theories are better suited to explain halloween.
Friday, 12 October 2012
My favourite horror trailer
Thursday, 13 September 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)